The stimulating day in Manchester concluded with a panel
discussion This provided attendees with the opportunity to grill the day’s
speakers, plus Alistair Brown, Museums Association Policy Advisor, who had
recently finished working on the MA’s new Code of Ethics
and Janet Ulph, expert on Law and Collections Management and author of guidelines
on Curatorially
Motivated Disposal.
The discussion kicked off with a question on what the MA’s
new Code of Ethics has to say about acquisitions and disposals. Alistair Brown
gave us the welcome advice that there has been no radical change on these
issues and that the MA’s position is that curatorially motivated disposal can
and should be conducted
and that, in certain circumstances, financially
motivated disposal can even be conducted ethically. Janet Ulph added
that, in addition to her rigorous guidelines on Curatorially Motivated
Disposal, she will be producing a short guidance document on the additional
obligations that the Government’s planned ratification of the Hague
Convention will impose on museums and is also working on guidance for
museums who face closure or the loss of a storage facility.
The discussion then turned to the question of what you
should do if you receive an object in the post and you are in some way
suspicious of its provenance. Janet Ulph emphasised that the act of someone
posting it to you could be construe as an intent to make a gift; the receiving
museum then has a choice whether or not to accept it. If it fits their
collecting policy, they could then accession it; however, if they are
suspicious, they should consult other museums. Either way, this is a good
strategy: other institutions may have an expert who can give reassurance about
the object’s provenance, and if they can’t, the recipient could at least make a
fuller report to the National Crime Agency.
Following on from an issue that Gillian Smithson had raised
earlier, the panel were then asked what a museum should do if they had
transferred an object in the 1950s or 60s without proper paperwork or due
diligence and the recipient then wanted to sell it. Alistair Brown stated that
this is unlikely to cause a problem for the originator museum unless the
scrutiny the sale draws will cause them reputational damage. Janet Ulph stated
that, under the Sale of Goods Act, the recipient can sell any item he owns
legitimately, so they would act legally. It was the UNESCO
convention of 1970 that necessitated provenance checks – if the
transfer happened before this was ratified, the originator museum had not done
anything illegal.
A member from the National Galleries of Scotland then asked
the panel how their various institutions deal with the disposal of
non-inventoried objects such as packing crates. The team from the Museum of
London mentioned that they, too, have some material like this to dispose of. They
follow a less onerous procedure than they would for collection items, but still
ensure that the disposal of these objects is documented. They conduct due
diligence checks to ensure that set dressing is not in fact accessioned and,
when this cannot be established, they take a risk-managed judgement.
The discussion concluded with a question about how we change
the perception of disposals as being a negative thing to do. Janet Ulph
explained that, to change this perception, museums must be very press-savvy and
aware of how disposals can be reported (or mis-reported). Kevin Gosling
suggested that the museum profession needs to change its ideas about
collections stewardship and asked whether we could learn from nature
conservation, where stewardship is a process of active management – you have to
prune dead wood to allow saplings to grow. He also noted that disposal doesn’t
have to mean destruction or sale and can mean that objects are used to greater
public benefit. The team from the Museum of London shared a story about how one
recipient was moved to tears at the generosity of their gift of what, from the
point of view of their collection, was duplicate material and how a cooker once
consigned to storage because it contained asbestos was rendered safe and
transferred to the RAF Museum for use in public display.
This was a stimulating end to an enlightening day that left
all attendees with a lot to think about the ethical and practical aspects of
acquisitions and disposals.
By Susannah Darby, Collections Information Officer, Science
Museum
No comments:
Post a Comment